| Wednesday, November 09, 2005 |
| Pre Documenting Age, the Mere Suggestion of this Would Merit a TinFoil Participation Ribbon |
Or be ignored by greater masses, while selfishly enjoyed by a privilaged few.
But low and behold, with virtually realtime documenting, point of fact a historical record, aided by the relative ease of the internets, with a what whoever wants to can do with em, and the TiVos, and all the crazy shit you can do with them too. We now have the technology available to check and re-check what is said and then claimed to have been said. It's awesome, because it's Green Kryptonite, undeniable evidence to the affirmitive. ThinkProgress would like to present.
There is a brewing controversy about what exactly was said at the White House press conference on October 31. Everyone agrees NBC’s David Gregory said this:
Q Whether there’s a question of legality, we know for a fact that there was involvement. We know that Karl Rove, based on what he and his lawyer have said, did have a conversation about somebody who Patrick Fitzgerald said was a covert officer of the Central Intelligence Agency. We know that Scooter Libby also had conversations.
Congressional Quarterly and FNS both transcribed Press Secretary Scott McClellan’s answer as “That’s accurate.” The White House transcript lists McClellan’s answer as “I don’t think that’s accurate.” |
posted by MindSquash the Brain Worm @ 5:28 PM   |
|
|
|
